Wednesday 20th February 2013
NSWNMA branches at the state’s public hospitals and community health centres are continuing to vote on a proposed staff ratios and wages claim which challenges the O’Farrell Government to build on the safer hospital staffing levels introduced in 2011 under an agreement between NSWNMA and the previous Labor government.
The current branch-voting schedule for the rest of this week, as advised to NSWNMA officials, is:
Wednesday, 20 February
Albury Base Hospital – 2.30pm
Canterbury Hospital – 3.00pm
Concord Hospital – 3.00pm
Fairfield Community – 3.00pm
Parkes Hospital – 3.00pm
Prince of Wales Hospital – 3.00pm
Wollongong Hospital – 2.30pm
Thursday, 21 February
Bega District Hospital – 3.00pm
Campbelltown Hospital – 3.30pm
Coffs Harbour Mental Health – 1.30pm
Coffs Harbour Hospital – 3.00pm
Dubbo Hospital – 3.00pm
Hunter Community Nurses – 4.00pm
Nexus Child & Adolescent Mental Health – 2.30pm
Orange Hospital – 2.30pm P
ambula District Hospital – 2.30pm
Shoalhaven Hospital – 1.30pm
St George Hospital – 2.00pm
Friday, 22 February
Grafton Hospital – 2.00pm
Griffith Hospital – 2.00pm
Sutherland Hospital – 1.00pm
As at 5.00pm today, the following branches have notified a vote in favour of the claim:
Local Health District – Branch Name
Local Health District – Branch Name
Central Coast Local Health District – Woy Woy Hospital
Hunter New England Local Health District – Maitland Hospital
Hunter New England Local Health District – Maitland Mental Health Unit
Justice Health and Forensic Mental Health Network – Justice Health Mid North Coast
Murrumbidgee Local Health District – Albury Mental Health Community Nurses
Nepean Blue Mountains Local Health District – Nepean Mental Health
Northern NSW Local Health District – Byron Bay District Hospital
Northern NSW Local Health District – Maclean Health Service
Northern Sydney Local Health District – Ryde Hospital and Community Health Service
South Eastern Sydney Local Health District – Randwick/Botany Community Nurses
South Eastern Sydney Local Health District – Royal Hospital For Women
Southern NSW Local Health District – Crookwell District Hospital
Western NSW Local Health District – Mudgee District Hospital
No branch has yet notified the NSWNMA office that it has voted against the claim.
267 NSWNMA branches, representing more than 33,000 public-sector nurses and midwives throughout NSW, are eligible to vote.
Branches must vote by 4.00pm Friday, 1 March. If approved by the branches the NSWNMA will then seek to have the claim incorporated into the new Public Health System Nurses & Midwives (State) Award, which replaces the current award when it expires on June 30 this year.
A key feature of the claim is guaranteed, safer nursing levels for seriously ill children, emergency departments and rural hospitals and multipurpose services, and safer nursing and midwifery staffing arrangements in community health services.
The claim also includes two 2.5 per cent per year payrises, which will provide the majority of experienced, full-time nurses and midwives with a payrise of more than $70.00 per week, or more than $3800.00 per year, by July 2014.
The first television advertising, in support of the claim, has already been run around the State.
The current award, which was finalised in February 2011, included the first stage of a major reform of staffing arrangements in NSW public hospitals. This reform included compulsory, minimum nursing ratios (or nursing hours per patient per day) for most wards in the State’s acute hospitals.
It resulted in medical/surgical patients in Group A (Principal Referral) hospitals being entitled to, on average, six hours of nursing per day, Group B (Major Metro and Regional) hospitals 5.5 nursing hours per day and Group C (District) hospitals five nursing hours per day.
In terms of maternity/birthing facilities, the former government also agreed to adopt Birthrate Plus as the staffing model for Midwifery Services. Birthrate Plus is the generally accepted staffing ratio model for births per midwife in the UK and has been adapted for the NSW environment.
These improvements in nursing and midwifery hours, and the resultant ratios that were delivered, required the employment of an additional 1580 full-time-equivalent nurses and midwives over the last two years and delivered ratios that were close to the claims for one nurse to four patients made by the NSWNMA in 2010-11 for the Group A and Group B hospitals. Rehabilitation, palliative care and inpatient acute mental health wards also received nurse to patient ratios via improved mandatory nursing hours per patient.
The O’Farrell Government, which came to office shortly after the finalisation of this historic staffing agreement, has regularly praised and claimed credit for the employment of these extra nurses and midwives.
The 2013 claim
The 2013 ratios and wages claim, about to be considered by NSWNMA branches around the State, was compiled after extensive research into the views, experiences and priorities of NSWNMA members, research into the working conditions and staffing levels currently operating in hospital wards and community health facilities that do not yet have ratios and lengthy discussion within the NSWNMA’s log of claims committee, which contains rank-and-file members from most areas of nursing and midwifery.
The claim seeks a 2.5 per cent annual payrise, without trade offs, in July 2013 and then another 2.5 per cent rise, also without trade offs, in July 2014.
b) Extension of staffing ratios
Key features of this claim, with regard to nurse and midwife staffing, include:
NSWNMA general secretary, Brett Holmes, said the introduction of safer staffing arrangements in NSW hospitals and community health services was always going to be done over time.
“Nurses and midwives working under the first round of compulsory, minimum ratios are clear they have provided a safer clinical and less stressed working environment. The challenge for the O’Farrell Government is to build on this and ensure every public patient in NSW has access to the same level of safer care.
“After all, the O’Farrell Government is very willing to take credit every time a new batch of nurses or midwives is employed to fill the new positions created by the ratios, which were actually agreed between the NSWNMA and previous Labor government. It will be interesting to see how it reacts now that it has a chance to act in its own right and extend this reform into other important areas such as children’s wards and rural facilities.
“Many people would be surprised and shocked to know that minimum staffing levels are currently not guaranteed in NSW hospitals for seriously ill infants and children. No right-thinking person could think that state of affairs should continue.
“And what about emergency departments and other high pressure areas such as intensive care units? They also don’t have guaranteed minimum staffing levels at the moment. Things usually work okay, because hardworking and responsible clinicians ensure they do. But to continue leaving it to chance is not acceptable. Minimum safe staffing must be guaranteed and enforceable.
“It is also now time to guarantee safer staffing levels in the State’s smaller country hospitals and multipurpose services. I grew up in the country myself and have strong personal feelings, as well as professional views about this. Rural people, who do not have immediate access to the major hospitals and all the bells and whistles that go with them, are at least entitled to the same guaranteed nursing and midwifery ratios as the big Sydney hospitals. In fact, because these hospitals don’t have the same level of other resources as the larger hospitals, there is an even stronger case for them having guaranteed safer staffing resources to compensate.
“Finally, governments and health administrators are always going on about the importance of primary health care and doing more to keep people out of hospital and minimising unnecessary hospital admissions. Community health services, including community mental health services, are vital to achieving this goal. However, they can’t do it if nurses and midwives are stretched to the limit. That is why it is now also time to introduce stricter, enforceable staffing arrangements in community health services, which include a reasonable balance between face-to-face patient or client time and the time required for things like travel, research and administration.
“As for the pay rise claim, it will maintain the position of nursing and midwifery in relation to similar professions, as we prioritise this important staffing reform at this time. We now await the verdict of our members,” Mr Holmes said.
Ph: 02 8595 1234